From a first test victory, the Lions conspired to lose but was rugby the real loser?

Meanwhile, New Zealand served up a fine win against the Australian team looking for fluency...

From a first test victory, the Lions conspired to lose but was rugby the real loser?

Lions vs South Africa II

A week is a long time in coaching.

Erasmus lit the blow torch in an unprecedented 60-minute analysis of the referee’s performance, with video clip support. Just what the game doesn’t need. Sure, all the clips chosen could be seen as correct, but what was Erasmus trying to achieve? We already have a growing number of supporters who are fed up with TMO involvements. It’s hard now to celebrate a try because you anticipate the TMO’s input. Instinctive joy is a thing of the past.

Was it a reaction to Gatland’s rant about the appointment of South African Marius Jonker’s, as TMO?

Was it aimed at firing up his own players, who faded badly in the first test?

World rugby will act on it because the product needs to be the focus. If it escalates, we’ll have young kids and parents complaining about the local referees, maybe using video analysis. Then we’ll run out of referees.

Meanwhile Gatland must have expected a playing storm because he selected Harris, a proven defender at 13, and restored Murray to the nine shirt, a proven box kicker. Defensive mind sets seldom work, especially if you are behind on the scoreboard!!

The first half of the second test was a more intense version of the first with little continuity and penetration. Consequently, there was no fluency.

De Klerk became the fuse wire the South African forwards needed. They shook off the lack of match fitness and got stuck in, often after the whistle. Stoppages, penalties, and yellow cards followed. Those of us who contemplated going on tour, tapped our wallets and sighed, phew that was close.

Itoje, Vunipola and Laws showed technical competency and the Lions went into the sheds 9-6 ahead.

What followed is hard to comprehend.

Coaches can usually smell complacency.

What happened in the Lions changing room?

Where did the players go?

The Boks took over on the field, dominated territory, executed perfectly, a kick from Pollard and Mapimpi scores. (44 min’s)

Like a Lion chasing prey the Boks closed in on set piece domination. Once achieved they dined on the proceeds. The result inevitable, 27-9

The Lions forwards had the look of the England forwards early in the World cup final, battered and bloodied. The Boks replacements added value. The Lions replacements raised questions. They needed tries, they got Owen Farrell, he kicks, he doesn’t run! Price was restored and looked sharp.

Where does Gatland go now, who does he turn to? He is a brave coach when it comes to selection.

Williams at Full back? Smith at 10? Simmonds/Faletau at 8? Laws and Wyn- Jones both looked shot at the end. 3 games in 3 weeks is a tough ask for a captain who had a major injury. Is Hamish Watson the spark the Lions need?

One thing is for certain the Boks will be ready to dine out on the set piece. They finished strong in the second test. Worryingly they looked healthy.

McBride and Townsend, forwards, and backs coaches, respectively will have their work cut out. The backs have looked predictable and laboured, kicking not creating. When it comes to playing style, you wonder who has the final say?

Tries will be needed, replacements will be needed, what will they bring to the table?

A resurgent Springboks squad will be hard to hold out.

My team

15 Williams

14 Adams

13 Daly

12 Aki

11 Watson/Rees-Zammit

10 Biggar/Smith

9 Price/Davies

8 Foletau/Simmons

7 Curry/Watson

6 Laws/ Beirne

5 Wyn -Jones/Henderson.

4 Itoje

3 Furlong

2 Owens/George

1 Vunipola/Sutherland

With some options.

Boks to win….24-12

Coaching thought

“Keeping the doubt out is a real coaching challenge”

Published: Saturday 20 April 2024